Utah: Cell phone laws, legislation
Last updated: April 29, 2010 · Print this report
Cell phone/texting news: A text-messaging law went into effect in 2009, but various attempts to ban driving while using a handheld cell phone have been ignored or defeated. The latest failed bill, from 2010, would have banned teens from using cell phones while driving. Utah’s 2010 legislative session ended in March.
Current prohibitions
- Text messaging outlawed for all drivers.
- Utah has a law on the books against “careless driving” — which can be defined as committing a moving violation while distracted by use of a hand-held cellphone or similar activities. Using a cell phone can bring additional penalties as a secondary violation.
2010 legislation
HB 237: Would have prohibited teens under 18 years old from using a cell phone while driving on Utah roads and highways. Penalties included points against the driver’s license. Defeated. (Riesen)
SB 113 (and substitute): Would make the ban against teen drivers using cell phones a secondary offense with no points against license. (Romero) Also a substitute version from the House agreeing to these provisions (Riesen). This was the compromise version of the teen cell phone bill. Both defeated.
2010 distracted driving notes
Rep. Phil Riesen, D-Holladay, saw another of his attempts to ban cell phone use by drivers defeated. In 2009 the ban would have been for all drivers; in 2010 it was for teens under 18.
2009 legislation
Utah House Bill 290: Prohibits text messaging while driving. Approved in the House and Senate and sent to Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., who signed it into law on March 25. Enforcement began July 1, 2009.
Utah Senate Bill 149 (sub): Would outlaw text messaging while operating a motor vehicle. Approved by the full Senate as a substitute bill and sent to the House Transportation Committee on Feb. 26, 2009. Filed as a defeated bill March 13.
HB 95, from Rep. Phil Riesen, would prohibit use of wireless devices while operating a motor vehicle. The bill includes text messaging and cell phones, and does not allow for use of hands-free devices. Bill dead for year.
HB 248: Would ban use of “wireless communication devices” while driving on Utah’s roads. Provides for use with hands-free devices. Includes text messaging and cites PDAs. “Bill substituted” on Feb. 20, creating exceptions for law enforcement, etc. Bill “held” (tabled) by House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee on Feb. 24 and filed as a defeated bill.
HB 281: Targets text messaging while driving. Would ban use of wireless communications devices while driving through reduced speed zones and parking lots, unless a hands-free device is utilized. Would prohibit drivers under 18 from using wireless devices while behind the wheel. Filed as a defeated bill March 13.
Utah cell phone legislation notes (through 2009)
Rep. Stephen Clark, R-Provo, sponsored the 2009 House plan to ban text messaging while driving. The vote in the Senate was 26-1. In the House it was 45-29.
Rep. Phil Riesen blamed the 2009 failure of his driving cell phone ban on retaliation for an unrelated ethics allegation he made against another lawmaker. He plans to try again in 2010.
Sen. Lyle Hillyard, R-Logan, saw his version of the texting ban SB 149 advance to the full Senate on Feb. 6, 2009, and then to the House after the Senate’s approval on Feb. 25. Penalties increase to possible jail time after two prior offenses. Texting and causing an accident would be considered a third-degree felony. Sen. Margaret Dayton, R-Orem, was the only senator to vote against Hillyard’s bill.
Hillyard told the Herald Journal that he didn’t include cell phones in his Utah texting bill because it would decrease the chances of passage: “(If) my bill is the only bill left because of the controversy about cell phones, I think my bill has a very good chance of passing.”
Rep. Carl Wimmer, R-Herriman, helped kill the hands-free bill HB 248, citing the careless driving offense on the books (above) and saying, “The bill would make no change in our law.”
Rep. Carol Spackman Moss, D-Holladay, defended her defeated HB 248: “You can make a big improvement in safety if people have both hands on the wheel.”
Earlier, Moss said, “It would at least be a first important step to get people to put both hands on the wheel again and not have a hand up to their ear.” She has been an advocate of such a law for several years.
Jeff Nigbur, spokesman for the state Department of Public Safety, said his group is watching all five Utah cell phone/texting bills, and “will focus on the one that gets close to passing.”
Rep. Phil Riesen’s cell phone driving bill HB 95 was endorsed by the Salt Lake Tribune on Jan. 28, 2009.
Rep. Paul Ray, R-Clinton, is preparing legislation for the 2009 session that would ban text messaging by drivers and outlaw cell phone use in certain school zones. “If we can restrict drinking and driving, we should certainly restrict anything else that causes potential harm and (texting while driving) is very high risk,” Ray told ABC4.com.
From the Salt Lake Tribune (Jan. 23):
Lawmakers in the past have resisted phone restrictions for cars, often citing a distaste for limiting personal liberties. It will be no different for some of them this year, and members of the Utah Transportation Commission who heard about the latest proposal at their meeting last month chuckled at its prospects. “Good luck with that,” Commissioner Glen Brown said after hearing the report.
The Utah lawmakers might want to check with their constituents. A Tribune poll of Utahns conducted in early January 2009 shows that 80% support limits on cell phone use by motorists. 15% were opposed to cell phone driving laws and 5% were undecided. (500 voters, margin of error 4.5%)
Utah assesses points against a drivers license for a cell-related conviction.





Why are police exempt from this law,I see law enforcement typing on thier computers inside thier vehicles, with moving traffic. Why cant citizens use this same law to do citizens arrest on police. I doubt if a cop is certified to be less accident free as a citizen. If so offer training to discredit the reports of unsafe drivers. If police can do it why cant the citizens do it.
Talking period,while driving would be in this mix of studies how would we police talking to passengers in personal vehicles. Or the bus driver talking to his passengers, What about the airline pilot talking to Air Traffic Control with his headset. Their are many people who can function normal while driving and doing multi things at the same time.Its the Individuall who will get into the wreck because they cant concentrate not the majority. Look how long law enforcement has typed on computers while driving. Surely a study was made on this group using multi task while driving.A small percentage per populas to make into law.
Cell phone and texting laws may reduce a portion of accidents, but what about the other distraction that are never brought up, like changing a radio station, or someone putting on makeup while driving, or shaving while driving, or reading notes or newspapers, Yes it sounds crazy but I have seen this. Yet we dont pass laws for these distractions, how about too many people in the vehicle like kids screaming so the driver gets distracted, or the tv in the vehicle so we can have the passengers watch. Doesnt these all play a part in vehicle safety. We rely on the public to use good judgement
Why dont we outlaw cars and trucks from driving on icy snow covered roads, This we know causes more wrecks than I believe in my opinion than the text msg, The drunks and the texters are hard to find but when it is bad weather and snow for fog we could controll everyone from driving by putting a alert or ban on all vehicles from driving on those days, and reduce accidents save lives and keep the insurance companys from having claims to save us all millions.
It’s almost as if Utah wants us teens to talk and drive at the same time.