Calif. teen-texting loophole closed

california texting ban signCalifornia teens are breaking the law if they text message while driving. Period.

Gov. Jerry Brown has signed legislation closing a loophole that allowed drivers under 18 to use voice-activated technology to text while driving.

The novice drivers aren’t allowed to use communications devices such as smartphones, whether hand-held or hands-free. (Adults are permitted to use hands-free devices.) But a 2012 revision to California’s distracted driving laws permits use of hands-free technology for texting, and that change applied to all drivers.

The 2012 change to the driving laws followed lobbying by the auto industry, which is protecting its heavy investments in “infotainment” dashboards.

The 2012 revision also protected use of voice-responsive apps such as the widely used Siri on Apple’s iPhones. Apple is developing vehicle dashboard systems as well and has lobbied against distracted driving laws that target voice-activated technologies.

“Even though teens may not be manually distracted, they could be visually or cognitively distracted by using Siri, Bluetooth, and touch-screen technologies,” said the new law’s author, freshman Sen. Cathleen Galgiani, D-Stockton

Hands-free texting was not a widespread feature when California banned texting and driving in 2007.

The Senate plan clarifying that teens can’t text and drive under any circumstances (SB 194) was signed by Gov. Jerry Brown on Oct. 11. It won easy approval from the Assembly in early September, following up the Senate’s OK of April.

Supporters of Galgiani’s distracted driving legislation included the California Association of Highway Patrolmen and the Automobile Club of Southern California.

The Assembly considered a 2013 plan (AB 313) to override the 2012 law permitting hands-free texting, but it was rejected by the Transportation Committee. It was then revived, but eventually was abandoned by its author.

Brown signed the law permitting hands-free texting in 2012, the same year he vetoed an increase in California distracted driving fines.

Read about California’s distracted driving laws.

Comments

  1. Is speaking into a voice-activated texting system such as Apple’s current or future products less distracting than speaking on a hands-free phone? Possibly (depending on the to-and-fro rate of the conversation, perhaps). But voice-activated texting is also a form of “cognitive distraction” – very different from looking out the window at billboards or fiddling with dials (visual and manual distraction). It is linguistic (cognitive) activity that makes the fundamental difference.

    The development of these “infotainment” consoles is a recipe for disaster. Legislation needs to stop making these completely ill-informed decisions to appease the manufacturers and that continue the barrage of distraction technology for zombies. Technically, perception is seeing the affordances – the possibilities for action. These interactive technology interfaces (screens, displays, etc) offer new “affordances about affordances” (“metaffordances”) that amplify reality in profound and curious ways – they divert our attention from the task at hand and consequently can confound our actions in adverse ways. The only action you want in a car is…driving. Don’t be hypnotized by the technology.

Post a comment, join the conversation

*

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.