New Hampshire: Cell phone laws, legislation

Last updated: March 30, 2010 · Print this report

new_hampshire state flag phone safety storyCell phone, texting news: A ban on text messaging went into effect Jan. 1, 2010. The state Senate began its 2010 session on March 31; the House reconvenes April 14.

Current prohibitions:
Text messaging outlawed for all drivers.

No limits on cell phone use.

2010 legislation:
HB 34: Prohibits text messaging and any other use of two hands for typing on an electronic device. Approved in the New Hampshire House and Senate. Signed into law by Gov. John Lynch on July 31 and went into effect Jan. 1, 2010.

HB 294: Would have prohibited text messaging while driving and use of two hands for typing on an electronic device. (Retained in committee as HB 34 advanced.)

Legislation notes:
“It is clear that texting while driving poses a serious danger on our roadways,” Gov. John Lynch said as he approved the anti-texting legislation House Bill 34. “This new law sends a strong message that drivers should be attentive to the road, and those around them at all times.”

The new texting law reads specifically: “A person operating a moving motor vehicle who writes a text message or uses 2 hands to type on or operate an electronic or telecommunications device, is guilty of a violation.” That offense brings a fine of $100.

Rep. Richard Drisko, R-Hollis, saw the amended version of his HB 34 approved by the House on March 24, 2009, on a 222-137 vote. The bill advanced to the Senate, where it was approved by the Transportation Committee in a 5-0 vote on May 14 and then by the full New Hampshire Senate on May 20. The governor signed the bill in late July and it went into effect as 2010 began.

Rep. David Campbell, D-Hillsborough, is the sponsor of HB 294.

HB 1222 sought to prohibit text messaging while driving. It was introduced in the 2008 session, passed in the House and was last seen in the Senate’s Transportation committee.

State Rep. Laura Pantelakos’ 2007 bill seeking to ban use of cell phones without hands-free devices was shelved.

Regarding the state’s Live Free or Die ethic, Pantelakos said: “I can live free, too, and die because someone’s not paying attention,” she said of her cell safety legislation. “I don’t want to see someone killed because a driver was not paying attention.”

Many police cars in New Hampshire are outfitted with voice-activated control systems, freeing up officers’ hands.

Share this report:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Comments

2 Responses to “New Hampshire: Cell phone laws, legislation”

  1. Rob Johnson on January 4th, 2010 5:03 pm

    Its not surprising NH would be passing this law. The state’s motto has got to be the most fraudulent of all state mottos. In truth NH police are breathing down people’s necks more than any other state. Pulled over 9 times in 2 weeks in NH for headlight out, not once in Mass, even though I drove far more there during those 2 weeks. Soon as you cross the line on 93 you see the blue lights flashing like crazy along the breakdown lane. Even though NH has scratched kicked and clawed its way over other states to mantain its 1st in the state primary status, an NH trooper wanted to arrest me for holding a sign in a non designated area. Only in NH would this happen. Its not the police fault. In order for every police dept in the state to be doing its best SS impersonation, it has to come from the top at the state house, another violation of a staple of true live free or die beliefs (decentralizationof power).

    Now the statists of NH have a new Orwellian tool at their disposal, police having NEW reason to look into every motorist’s car to see what they are doing with their hands. (Hopefully, they will see more than they bargained for and stop the practice!!!!!) But seriously, how do they prove the violation? I mean can you really prove what someone was doing behind the wheel other than judging the movement of the vehicle? This is soooo big bro. Who wants cops staring into their car under the guise of safety? Does such an encroaching police state really make us “safer”? Safety is the buzz word for give gov more power. It likely will require more evidence to hold up, such as “give me that device, I wanna check the text log to see it u just sent a text”. If refused, it may require contacting the cell provider, more data mining Bushie boy luvs, only at the locoal level. More gov at all levels. How wonderful. From Patriot act to local driving safety, does anyone really believe safety as opposed to control is the real agenda???????

  2. tierney parry on August 24th, 2010 10:28 am

    So since the law states a person driving cannot use two hands to text, does this mean I can use my on screen key board and text with 1 hand. Or text using my nose????

Have something to say? We want to hear what you think about distracted driving laws and legislation -- pro, con or undecided.





Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes