Missouri: Cell phone laws, legislation

Last updated: September 20, 2023
Legislative update: A handheld cell phone law is now in effect in Missouri. It took effect Aug. 28 with warnings until early 2025. Senate Bill 398 from Sen. Nick Schroer sets fines from $150 to $500, with enhanced punishments for school-zone and work-zone violations. Limited to secondary enforcement, meaning police would need another reason for a traffic stop. Signed into law in early July by Gov. Mike Parson.

missouri state flag The Missouri DOT reports a rise in work-zone crashes despite the recent decreased traffic volumes during the Covid outbreak. “Distracted driving has been recognized as a major factor in work-zone crashes,” said Nicole Hood, a state highway safety engineer. DOT says 80 percent of crashes here involve distraction.

Current distracted driving prohibitions:

  • All drivers barred from holding electronic communications devices such as cell phones.
  • Drivers 21 or younger prohibited from text messaging.
  • Commercial drivers barred from texting or using handheld cell phones.

Local distracted driving laws in Columbia, Chesterfield, Lake St. Louis, St. Charles, Kirkwood, Sunrise Beach, Florissant, Ellisville, Manchester and St. John and O’Fallon.

Distracted driving legislation (2023)
Senate Bill 398: Would prohibit the holding of electronic communications devices such as mobile phones while driving. Fines: $150, then $250, then $500. Fine $500 for work-zone and school-zone violations. Secondary enforcement. Approved by the House, and then by the Senate in a 26-7 vote of May 11. Signed into law by the governor July 7. (Schroer)

SB 56: (as amended in committee) Would outlaw use of handheld communications devices while driving. Fines: $150, then $250, then $500. Secondary enforcement. Warnings until January 2025. Approved by the full Senate in a 22-11 vote of March 30. To the House. (Bean)

Substitute for SB 56 and 61: Would outlaw holding of electronic communications devices and text messaging while driving. Fines: up to $50 and 2 points vs. the license (first offense); then $100 and 3 points; then $250 and 4 points. $500 for work-zone violations. Approved by Transportation on Feb. 20 and sent to the full Senate. (Transportation Committee)

SB 56: (see above) Would outlaw use of handheld communications devices while driving. Fines: up to $50 and 2 points vs. the license (first offense); then $100 and 3 points; then $250 and 4 points. $500 for work-zone violations. Amended to secondary enforcement, etc. (Bean)

SB 61: Would bar handheld use of electronic wireless communication devices while driving. No use of devices for those under age 18 or with an instructional license. $50 fine doubled in school or work zones. (Razer)

House Bill 228: Seeks to prohibit use of handheld communications devices while driving. (Bangert)

HB 304: Seeks to establish a handheld cell phone ban for all drivers. Includes use as a phone. Drivers under age 18 with restricted licenses barred from all uses of wireless devices. Fine: $50, doubled in school zones or work zones. (Roberts)

HB 664: Would ban use of handheld devices to send, read or write electronic messages while driving. (Evans)

HB 756: Seeks to outlaw texting and Internet use while driving. (Morse)

Distracted driving legislative notes (2023):
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch called the distracted driving plan sent to the governor “better late than never, and better than nothing. That’s about the best that can be said” because the act “doesn’t make cellphone usage a primary offense for which a driver can be pulled over.” The editorial board noted Missouri’s sad-sack status on the issue, “a state that has badly lagged the nation in addressing the scourge of distracted driving.”

At least six distracted driving measures were before lawmakers in 2023. They ranged from handheld cell phone bans to simple extensions of the current texting ban to adult drivers.

State Sen. Jason Bean withdrew his hands-free measure after it was watered down to secondary enforcement, but it advanced anyway and was approved by the full Senate on March 30. It advances to the House. “If a police officer sees this and they can’t stop the person then why are we doing the bill?” Bean asked.

(text continues)

Distracted driving legislative notes (2022):
A Missouri Department of Transportation representative testified at a March 1 hearing in favor of SB 713. “(It) is not the automatic solution to the distracted driving problem, but it is a good first step to encouraging safe driver behavior,” he said. This year has seen a record number of crashes in work zones, he told the transportation committee.

More than 2,200 crashes in Missouri were linked to electronic distracted driving during 2021. Overall, there were 1,007 fatalities last year, the deadliest year on state roads and highways since 2006.

“We need to make sure our students are safe as they hurry to and from school,” state Rep. Chris Dinkins said of the revival of his previous legislation on the issue.

2022 distracted driving legislation

Senate Bill 713: Would outlaw use of handheld communications devices while driving. (Razer)

House Bill 1479: Would bar handheld cell phone use in school zones, work zones and construction zones. (Dinkins)

HB 1487: Would outlaw texting, typing and use of video while driving. For drivers under age 21, all handheld uses of electronic devices barred except navigation. Fines: $50 and 4 points vs. license (first offense); $100 and 6 points (second); and $250 and 8 points plus possible license suspension (subsequent). (Porter)

HB 1571: Would extend texting ban for drivers under age 21 to all drivers. Hands-free operation OK. Fine: $50, doubled in school zones or work zones. (Wallingford)

HB 1701: Seeks to establish a handheld cell phone ban for all drivers. Includes use as a phone. Drivers under age 18 with restricted licenses barred from all uses of wireless devices. Fine: $50, doubled in school zones or work zones. (Roberts)

HB 1884: Would prohibit use of handheld cell phones in school zones. (Pollitt)

 

2021 distracted driving legislative notes:
The State Highway Patrol reports 989 traffic fatalities during 2020. That’s a 12 percent increase from 2019. “Over 90 percent of these crashes were the result of someone simply making a poor decision, primarily: driving too fast, driving distracted or driving impaired,” a public information officer said. “Many of those killed were not wearing a seat belt.” There were 126 pedestrians killed in 2020. That’s the largest number of pedestrian fatalities in Missouri history.

A trio of distracted-driving bills ignored during the coronavirus-affected 2020 session were refiled for 2021. Two seek to expand the state’s texting & driving limitations to all drivers, regardless of age. Missouri is one of two remaining states that don’t have a law against texting by all drivers.

2021 distracted driving legislation:
House Bill 73: Would bar motorists from using handheld cell phones in school zones and in construction or work zones. Hands-free OK. (Dinkins)

HB 110: Would prohibit anyone from using a handheld wireless communication device while driving a non-commercial motor vehicle unless the device is equipped for hands-free operation and is being used in that manner. Same as House Bill 1265 of 2020, below. (Bangert)

HB 241: Would bar text messaging by all drivers in Missouri, not just those under age 21. Same as HB 1633 of 2000. (Porter)

HB 258: Would extend texting & driving prohibition to all ages. Same as HB 1290 of 2020. (Evans).

2020 distracted driving legislative notes:
State Rep. David Evans filed a bill for the 2020 session seeking to outlaw texting by all drivers, not just those under age 21. “If you don’t file a bill early, get the attention of the right committees, get senators interested in reviewing, it’s very difficult to get legislation passed,” Evans told Ozarks First. “I’ve got high hopes.” Update: He refiled the measure for 2021 as HB 258. (There was no activity on distracted driving in 2020, the year of coronavirus.) Two measures from 2019 sought a full ban on texting & driving in Missouri, but neither managed to advance.

Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas filed legislation seeking to cut down on driver inattention. The proposed ordinance cited reading, grooming and entering GPS information. It did not specifically mention texting & driving, because state law bars that at the local level. The City Council voted Jan. 30 to move the bill back to committee over racial-profiling concerns. “It’s strange to me that in this city, the largest city in Missouri, we can’t figure out a way to address what really is an epidemic,” Mayor Pro Tem Kevin McManus said.

The Kansas City Star editorialized on the city’s proposed distracted driving law: “Missouri lawmakers’ pigheadedness in the matter leaves local officials little choice but to take matters into their own hands — and to try convincing the rest of us to keep our phones out of ours.”

Distracted driving legislation (2020):
House Bill 1265: Would extend texting & driving prohibition to all ages and also bar handheld phone calls. (Bangert)

HB 1290: Would bar text messaging by all drivers in Missouri, not just those under age 21. (Evans)

HB 1304: Seeks to ban handheld cell phone use in school zones. (Dinkins)

HB 1633: Same as HB 1290. (Porter)

HB 1674: Seeks to ban texting & driving for all ages. (Bland Manlove)

2019 distracted driving legislation:
Senate Bill 15: Would ban texting by drivers of all ages. Fine: $50, doubled in school or work zone. Hands-free texting OK. (Wallingford)

House Bill 50: Would bar use of a handheld wireless communication device while driving unless the device is equipped for hands-free operation and is being used in that manner. (Bangert)

HB 68: Would bar use of handheld wireless communications devices in school zones. (Dinkins)

HB 74: Seeks to prohibit use of handheld wireless communications devices by drivers 18 years of age and older. Hands-free OK. (Tate)

HB 211: Would bar use of handheld wireless communications devices by drivers 18 years of age and older. Hands-free OK. (Razer)

HB 223: Would extend texting & driving ban to all motorists. (Hansen)

2019 distracted driving legislative notes:
A half dozen bills were filed for 2019 seeking to rein in the use of handheld cell phones by drivers in Missouri. Only one received a hearing. State Reps. Gretchen Bangert and Nate Tate are among the legislators targeting drivers’ cell phone use. In the Senate, Wayne Wallingford refiled his measure that would outlaw texting by all drivers, not just those under age 21.

2018 distracted driving legislative notes:
More than a dozen distracted driving bills were filed for 2018. None found any traction. Same story in 2017 and 2016. State Rep. Jim Hansen says “pressure” from the public and media needs to be put on the House and Senate leadership. Missouri is one of three states without a texting ban covering all drivers.

State Rep. Galen Higdon filed legislation for 2018 banning use of handheld communications devices by drivers. The former sheriff’s deputy says his constituents “think it’s a hazard for people to be on their phone and texting while they’re driving down the road — and I agree.” The House’s leaders disagreed, however: Both of Higdon’s bills were rejected for a floor vote.

Sunrise Beach has approved a texting & driving ban that affects all drivers in the city. Fines up to $200. The July 9 vote by the City Council was unanimous.

Excelsior Springs’ City Council approved a texting & driving law that allows for local handling offenses. The late June enactment of the ordinance means offenders and subpoenaed officers no long have to go to Liberty City for distracted driving cases. The local law is in line with the state’s law.

State Rep. Galen Higdon says “the voice of the people” wants “texting and driving to cease.” But the legislature’s leaders don’t agree, he says. He called on schools and students to get involved in lobbying lawmakers.

Higdon’s HB 1302 of 2018 would supersede the various distracted driving ordinances in place around Missouri. The law would be an expansion of his 2017 plan to ban handheld device use by drivers for hire, which was approved by the House but stalled in the Senate.

Distracted drivers are linked to 138 crashes in Missouri in 2017 involving emergency vehicles.

2018 distracted driving legislation:
Senate Bill 749: Would ban texting by drivers of all ages. Fine: $50, doubled in school or work zone. (Wallingford)

SB 755: Would extend ban on texting to drivers over age 21. Fine: $50, doubled in school or work zone. (Schupp)

SB 903: Would expand state law require careful operation of vehicles to include violations by using a variety of electronic devices such as cell phones, portable computers and GPS. Would repeal existing texting law for young drivers. (Dixon)

House Bill 1292: Would bar drivers from text messaging in school zones. (Henderson)

HB 1297: Would ban texting and use of cell phones by drivers of all ages unless done in hands-free mode. (Brown)

HB 1298: Would prohibit text messaging by all drivers unless voice-recognition hands-free mode employed. (Brown)

HB 1302: Seeks to ban use of handheld communications devices by all drivers. OK to swipe/turn on devices. Drivers under age 18 and those with novice licenses barred from using all wireless communications devices. Would supersede any local locals. Apparently dead. (Higdon)

HB 1489: Would outlaw use of handheld wireless communications devices while driving in Missouri. Drivers under 18 barred from use of any wireless communications devices. Fine: $50 but doubled in work zones. (Matthiesen)

HB 1600: Would bar commercial drivers from using handheld wireless communications devices. Approved by the Public Safety Committee in a unanimous vote of Jan. 24. Approved by the Oversight Committee in a 10-1 vote of Jan. 30. Apparently dead. (Higdon)

HB 1622: Would outlaw use of handheld wireless communications by all drivers. Hands-free OK for drivers over age 18. Fine: $50 but doubled in work zones. (Reiboldt)

HB 1640: Would outlaw use of handheld communications devices while driving. Hands-free OK. (Bangert)

HB 1745: Would ban text messaging by all drivers. (Hansen)

HB 1952: Seeks to outlaw use of handheld wireless communications by all drivers. Hands-free OK for fully licensed drivers over age 18. (Tate)

2017 distracted driving legislation:
House Bill 284: Would outlaw use of handheld communications devices while driving. Hands-free OK. Same as HB 1544 of 2016, below. Did not get a hearing. (Brown)

HB 293: Would bar drivers for hire from using handheld communications devices. Approved by the House in a 103-46 vote of April 24. Did not advance in Senate. (Higdon)

HB 312: Would bar drivers from using handheld communications devices. Allows hands-free operation and use of hands to enable hands-free functions. Fines: $25 (first offense), then $50/$75/$100 with points. Fines doubled in work zones and school zones. Outlaws use of wireless communications devices by drivers under age 18 with novice licenses. Supersedes any local laws. Did not get a hearing. (Walker)

HB 378: Would make texting illegal for all drivers unless hands-free technology is employed. Did not get a hearing. (Brown)

HB 546: Would bar texting by drivers of all ages. Did not get a hearing. (Hansen)

Senate Bill 165: Would apply ban on text messaging to all drivers. See SB 821 of 2016. Did not get a hearing. (Schupp)

2017 distracted driving notes:
Missouri logged more than 1,700 crashes linked to cell phones during 2016. At least 14 people died in those crashes and 816 were injured.

Columbia’s City Council has effectively banned distracted driving. The local law now says cell phone use can be cited as evidence a motorist was guilty of not practicing “careful and prudent driving.” Columbia joins Kirkwood as one of the few cities to expand on the state distracted driving law. The unanimous vote came Dec. 18.

Missouri ranked dead last among states in the National Safety Council’s 2017 “State of Safety” report. The state failed to register a single check in the distracted driving-law category, receiving an overall “F.” Missouri also was gigged for all three seat-belt items.

Missouri Department of Transportation chief Patrick McKenna told a transportation oversight panel that “we have to have counter measures to this epidemic” of distracted driving.

Reps. Cloria Brown and Nate Walker have filed separate plans to ban handheld communication device use by all drivers. House Bill 284 is a rerun of Brown’s legislation from 2016, which failed to make it out of committee, a fate shared by all distracted driving measures in that session. Brown also has a plan to extend the state ban on texting by drivers 21 and younger to all motorists. Walker’s HB 312 also would double fines in work zones and school zones, and seeks to bar use of cell phones by drivers under age 18. State Sen. Jill Schupp also returns in 2017 with her plan to expand the texting & driving law. All of the distracted driving legislation died as time ran out on the 2017 session.

State Rep. Cloria Brown says of her latest bid to rein in electronic distracted driving: “It’s wrong for someone 18 to text; it’s wrong for someone 80 to text. It’s just wrong.”

2016 distracted driving legislation:
Senate Bill 569: Would make adults subject to existing state texting ban for younger drivers. (Pearce)

SB 821: Seeks to apply current texting & driving texting ban to all drivers. (Schupp)

House Bill 1377: Would make existing state texting ban apply to all drivers. (English)

HB 1423: Would apply state texting ban apply to all drivers. (Walker)

HB 1542: Would permit only hands-free texting by all drivers in Missouri. Applies to all ages. (Brown)

HB 1544: Would outlaw use of handheld communications devices while driving. Hands-free OK. (Brown)

2016 distracted driving notes:
State Sen. David Pearce says he hopes another lawmaker will take up his cause of expanding the state ban on texting by drivers 21 and younger to all motorists. Pearce left office at the end of the year because of term limits, however. Texting & driving is “a huge safety issue,” the veteran lawmaker said. The Senate’s president recently lobbied for a texting ban.

At least a half dozen distracted driving bills were filed for the 2016 session. In the House, three bills sought to expand the texting ban, while a fourth was designed to outlaw the use of handheld communications devices by all drivers. None made it past committee.

State Sen. Jill Schupp, whose SB 821 failed in 2016, vows to continue pushing for a texting law in Missouri. She calls it “a no-brainer.”

State Sen. David Pearce says his plan for a general texting & driving ban failed in part because of concerns over its definition of texting. “I think that we can come up with language that makes it very specific, so there’s nothing arbitrary about it,” the veteran legislator told Missourinet as he prepared to leave office.

The Highway Patrol reports 861 traffic deaths in Missouri in 2015, with almost 100 linked to driver inattention, including cell phone use. Texting & driving was cited in 357 crashes.

Senate President Pro Tem Ron Richard says he’s a strong supporter of outlawing texting & driving for all drivers. “I’m of a mind with Clint Eastwood: Hang ’em high,” he said at a session for the press at the governor’s mansion in early February.

House Speaker Todd Richardson said comparing distracted driving with drunken driving is “a mistake” “that diminishes the impact of drunk driving.”

Rep. T.J. Berry says he thinks a texting law could emerge from the 2016 legislative session.

A AAA survey found 93 percent strong support for a texting ban that applied to all drivers in Missouri. “There’s no magic age where texting behind the wheel suddenly becomes safe,” said Mike Right, vice president of AAA Public Affairs. A hands-free requirement for cell phone use drew the backing of 73 percent, while a total ban on cell phone use had the strong support of 50 percent.

State Sen. David Pearce is trying again in 2016 with distracted driving legislation. This time, he proposes to make the texting & driving ban apply to all ages. “This common-sense legislation has long been a priority of mine,” Pearce said as he prepared to prefile the distracted driving legislation Dec. 1. His previous attempts with distracted driving bills came in 2014 and 2015.

Pearce added: “It’s become common for folks to joke about having a fear of missing out. Is any text really important enough to risk missing out on the rest of your life? Or worse yet, causing someone else to miss out on the rest of theirs?”

State Sen. Jill Schupp points out that Missouri is one of only four states where texting & driving remains legal. “Texting and driving is a dangerous distraction, not just for those under age 22, but for all of us,” Schupp said in announcing her 2016 texting bill. “It is time for the law to require responsible driving habits of all drivers, not just some.”

2015 distracted driving legislation:
House Bill 27: Seeks to outlaw text messaging by drivers regardless of age. Allows for hands-free texting. See HB 1256 of 2014, below. (Kratky)

Senate Bill 3: Would make use of handheld cell phones and texting & driving illegal for all motorists. Moving violation. See SB 840 of 2014, below. (Pearce)

2015 distracted driving notes:
No young drivers reportedly have been punished for texting and driving in many of the counties in Missouri. Yet, teen drivers account for about 13 percent of inattentive driving fatalities, the largest of any age group, according to the state insurance department.

State Sen. David Pearce says previous distracted driving bills have failed in Missouri because they were “too general.”

Two lawmakers were back for the 2015 session with reruns of their distracted driving legislation. State Rep. Michele Kratky prefiled her plan to extend the state texting law to drivers of all ages.

The debate over O’Fallon’s broad distracted driving law was triggered by Councilman John Haman, who called the law “an overreach.” His bid to repeal the law narrowly fell short. The O’Fallon’s City Council deadlocked Feb. 26 on the repeal of the local distracted driving ordinance, with the mayor breaking the tie in favor of keeping the broadly worded law. The ordinance, approved last fall, lists various distracted driving offenses, such as reading, grooming and inputting data into a GPS device.

2014 distracted driving notes:
At least six bills were filed for 2014 seeking to toughen the Missouri distracted driving laws, but none found any traction before the session ended.

Chesterfield has outlawed texting for drivers of all ages. The unanimous City Council vote came Dec. 1.

St. Charles has banned texting for all drivers, with the City Council voting 9-1 to ban the practice Sept. 2. The fine for text messaging behind the wheel will be up to $300. The mayor indicated she would sign the legislation. Florissant, Manchester, Kirkwood and St. John have similar bans on texting by all drivers.

Kirkwood’s city council has banned texting by all drivers in city limits. Municipal public safety violation with fines up to $1,000, but the incident will not be reported to the state as a moving violation unless the driver is under 21 and in violation of Missouri law. Kirkwood is a suburb of St. Louis.

The Missouri Department of Insurance says teens will have to pay up if they don’t stop texting while driving. Increases in teen insurance premiums go up more than 70 percent after wrecks, the department says. “Not only can distracted driving cost lives, it also can cost you thousands of dollars in higher insurance premiums,” said John Huff, director of the department. “This is money that could have been spent on college, a vacation, or a down payment on a home.” A department video features a teen who had to stop driving after a texting wreck.

Lake St. Louis has banned texting & driving in city limits. The law applies to all drivers, not just teens. The unanimous Board of Aldermen vote came in late October. In mid-May, the board dropped a similar plan, deciding, instead, to write lawmakers pushing for statewide action. St. Louis County municipalities Manchester and St. John in late 2013 enacted texting bans that affect all drivers.

The St. Louis County Municipal League honored Manchester with a public safety award for the city’s texting & driving ban.

Perryville has banned texting by drivers 21 and younger. The Board of Aldermen also approved a prohibition on use of handheld wireless communications devices by commercial drivers at its March 17 meeting. Fines $35 to $75.

Col. Ron Replogle, superintendent of the Missouri Highway Patrol, testified in favor of a texting & driving ban Feb. 18: “I think it will cause some people to put their phones up. I think it will cause some people to get hands-free devices. … I do think this bill sends the right message to the public.”

The city of Washington has ordered city workers not to text while driving. The new policy also discourages cell phone use by drivers and tells them to pull to the side of the road if a call is necessary. The City Council OK’d the policy Feb. 6.

2014 distracted driving legislation:
House Bill 1106: Would prohibit use of handheld wireless communications devices by all drivers. Adds cell phone use to existing texting ban and removes restriction to drivers under age 21. (Gatschenberger)

Senate Bill 840: Would outlaw use of handheld wireless communications devices by all drivers. Bans texting for all drivers and requires hands-free operation of cell phones. (Pearce)

HB 1123: Would require points vs. driver’s license for texting & driving — 8 points for first offense; 12 points for subsequent offenses. Would ban wearing of head-mounted display (such as Google Glass) while operating vehicles. Would establish increased penalties for distracted driving law ranging from 30-day license suspension (first offense) to 10 days in jail (third offense). (Gosen)

HB 1256: Would bar all drivers from texting unless a hands-free technology is employed. (Kratky)

HB 1282: Seeks to outlaw text messaging by all drivers. (English)

HB 1316: Would ban text messaging by all drivers by removing under-age-21 limit of current prohibition. (Ellinger)

2013 distracted driving notes:
Manchester has banned text messaging for all drivers, regardless of age. Fines up to $1,000 with the possibility of a 90-day jail sentence. Aldermen voted for the ordinance Dec. 16. Florissant, another city in St. Louis County, already banned the practice for all drivers.

The Missourian reported that statewide, an average of four people a month are ticketed or charged with texting & driving violations. The 2009 law applies to drivers under the age of 21. Prosecutors say the age limit hinders enforcement since it requires police to make a determination of age of drivers in moving vehicles, the Missourian reported Feb. 15, 2013.

State Rep. Chuck Gatschenberger returned in 2013 with his plan to prohibit all drivers from using handheld communications devices, but it failed to get a hearing or a vote. His HB 1148 of 2012 also died, as did at least six other distracted driving bills.

2013 distracted driving legislation:
House Bill 145: Would ban use of handheld wireless communications devices while driving. Hands-free operation OK. Includes cell phones. (Gatschenberger)

HB 394: Would apply Missouri text messaging law to all drivers, regardless of age. Allows for voice-operated texting. (Kratky)

HB 524: Seeks to bar all drivers in Missouri from texting while behind the wheel, instead of those 21 and under. Exempts voice-recognition hands-free texting. (Schupp)

2012 distracted driving legislation:
House Bill 1083: Seeks to outlaw text messaging while driving via handheld electronic wireless communications devices. Exempts voice-recognition technology such as those preinstalled in a vehicle. Infractions would be moving violations subject to points against a driver’s license. “Public hearing completed” April 2. (Wells)

HB 1148: Would prohibit drivers from using cell phones or text messaging unless a hands-free device is employed. (Gatschenberger)

HB 1334: Would bar any driver being paid to transport passengers from using handheld wireless communications devices. Hands-free operation OK. “Public hearing completed” March 28. (Meadows)

HB 1419: Would apply text messaging prohibition for drivers 21 or younger to all drivers. Prohibits traffic stops “solely to determine compliance” with texting law, meaning secondary enforcement. See SB 567, below. (Colona)

HB 1430: Seeks to ban text messaging for all drivers. Hands-free voice activated texting OK. (Kratky)

Senate Bill 567: Would apply text messaging prohibition for drivers 21 or younger to all drivers. Secondary enforcement. “Hearing conducted” by Transportation Committee on Jan. 25. (Wright-Jones)

SB 717: A general distracted driving bill. Violations occur if driver “fails to give full time and attention to the operation of the motor vehicle,” “fails to maintain a proper lookout” or strays from “the primary mission of driving.” Class C misdemeanor unless accident results, in which case a violation is a Class A misdemeanor. Latest legislative action: Approved by the Transportation Committee on Feb. 23 and now before the full Senate as an “informal calendar” item. (Stouffer)

2012 distracted driving notes:
The 2012 Legislature had before it at least seven distracted driving bills, but none came to a vote. Most of the bills sought to ban text messaging by all drivers in Missouri. A general distracted driving bill was filed as well.

The Senate considered both of the distracted driving bills before it. The House says it conducted several public hearings.

The Kansas City suburb of Mission (Kansas) was considering a ban on handheld cell phones. Enforcement would be primary, allowing police to stop and cite violators. Among the concerns — the Johnson County suburb already has a reputation for running speed traps.

The city of Forsyth approved an inattentive driving ordinance on March 5, 2012. “We saw a big jump in distracted driving accidents,” Mayor Ron Potter says. Police reported that as many of 55 percent of accidents in 2011 were linked to distractions. The Forsyth law is now in effect with fines up to $500.

State Rep. Tim Meadows says his plan to bar use of handheld electronic devices by for-hire drivers dovetails with the recent federal curbs on interstate truckers. “The government is already saying to the trucking industry that they’re not allowed to be on their cell phones,” said Meadows, D-District 101. “This should send a message to the rest of the public.” Meadows supports a statewide ban on handheld electronics use by all drivers.

A Jan. 25 hearing on Senate Bill 567 included supportive testimony from the Missouri Trucking Association, the Highway Patrol and the State Medical Association. Sen. Robin Wright-Jones, D-St. Louis, is the sponsor.

Rep. Don Wells, R-Cabool, returns with House Bill 1083, which would prohibit texting via handheld devices by all drivers. It’s a rerun of his HB 600 of 2011. Wells says he regretted supporting the current Missouri law that bans texting just for younger drivers. “Missouri was the laughingstock of the country for passing that law,” Wells said.

A two-day Distracted Driving Summit was held in Jefferson City on Feb. 16-17.

Driver inattention is listed as the No. 1 cause of traffic accidents in Missouri.

2011 distracted driving notes:
No distracted driving legislation survived the 2011 session. The House approved a plan to remove the “21 and under” restriction from the current texting & driving law, but time ran out on the bill.

The National Transportation Safety Board recommended a total ban on cell phone use by U.S. drivers following its probe of a distracted driving wreck in Missouri. A Missouri teenager sent and received multiple text messages just before he caused a chain of rear-end collisions that left two people dead and 38 injured, the NTSB reported Dec. 12. The August 2010 accident involved the teen’s pickup truck, a tractor-trailer and two school buses. The teenage driver and a student in one of the buses died.

In the legislature’s final days, House Bill 600 and Senate Bill 11 were the surviving measures that would have extended Missouri’s ban on teens texting while driving to all drivers, regardless of age. HB 600 incorporates HB 337 from Rep. Don Wells.

A House hearing on two plans to ban text messaging for all drivers reportedly found the committee siding with HB 337 from Rep. Don Wells, although no vote was taken. The idea of an overall texting ban “was almost universally well received,” the Post-Dispatch reported March 2. A similar bill that called for secondary enforcement (HB 317) generated less enthusiasm.

In 2009, state Sen. Ryan McKenna saw his legislation result in Missouri’s texting ban for young drivers. In 2010, his bid to extend the ban to adult drivers failed. McKenna, D-Crystal City, tries again in 2011 with SB 11 (above), which was approved by the Senate Transportation Committee on Jan. 26. Texting while behind the wheel is “a bad idea regardless of age,” he says. A House bill seeks the same sanctions.

Ryan says of the teens-only texting ban: “It makes horrible public policy to say if you are 22 or older, it is safe to text and drive.”

The Springfield News-Leader editorialized on Jan. 27: “Missouri Highway Patrol officers have urged a total ban on texting, and now lawmakers must step up.” Noting that the current ban only applies to young drivers, the paper wrote, “Well, we might get wiser as we gain driving experience, but our reflexes don’t generally work any faster.”

2011 distracted driving legislation:
HB 600 (incorporates HB 337, below): Would ban text messaging for all drivers in Missouri. Applies to use of handheld devices, but allows “voice-recognition hands-free texting.” Measure includes several unrelated bills. OK’d by the Crime Prevention and Public Safety Committee (March 3) and the Rules Committee (April 14). Latest legislative action: Approved by the House on a 103-44 vote taken April 26. Transmitted to the Senate and in the Judiciary Committee. Senate executive session marks bill “do pass” on May 9. Bill placed on “informal calendar” May 12. Bill dead for year. (Wells)

Senate Bill 11: Would extend the ban on text messaging by teen motorists to all drivers. Hands-free texting OK. Also allows communities to craft distracted driving legislation providing it is not more restrictive than the state law. Approved by the Senate Transportation Committee on Jan. 26 and sent to the Senate floor. Latest action: Do not pass recommendation issued by Ways & Means and Fiscal Oversight Committee on March 7. Scheduled for third reading May 9 in Senate as SCS for SB 11. Dead. (McKenna)

House Bill 93: Seeks to make the texting ban for drivers under 21 apply to all drivers. No action and “hearing not scheduled” as of March 1. Dead. (Shively)

HB 317: Would make text messaging illegal for Missouri drivers, regardless of age. Secondary enforcement. Latest action: Hearing before the House Public Safety Committee on March 2, but no vote taken. (Colona)

HB 337: Would ban text messaging for all drivers in Missouri. Applies to use of handheld devices, but not hands-free operation. Latest action: Folded into HB 600, above. (Wells)

2010 legislation (dead):
HB 2111: Text messaging ban would be extended to all drivers regardless of age under this broad transportation bill. Approved by the House on April 29 (102-9 vote). First-round approval by the Senate on April 26, with amendments unrelated to texting. Sent to Fiscal Oversight Committee.

SB 701: Would ban texting by all Missouri drivers. Moving violation with points. Cleared the Senate Transportation Committee on April 13. (McKenna)

Missouri House Bill 1202: Would prohibit text messaging by all drivers, regardless of age, on any paved road. (Kuessner)

HB 1205: Would outlaw text messaging by all drivers. (Schad)

HB 1276: Would bar all Missouri drivers from texting. (Wells)

HB 1315: Would outlaw text messaging by all Missouri drivers, regardless of age (Shivley)

Cell phone, texting notes (pre-2011):
In the 2010’s first six months, 17,535 accidents in Missouri had some link to distracted driving, the Highway Patrol said. There were 791 traffic crashes related to mobile phone use behind the wheel, with eight fatalities and 239 injuries.

Public Safety Committee Chairman Mark Bruns, R-Jefferson City, said none of the 2010 plans for adding adults to the texting ban advanced because, in part, it is too hard for police to tell if a driver is over 21. Bruns said enforcement was so tricky that there should be no texting ban in Missouri.

Cell phone use while driving contributed to more than 1,780 accidents in Missouri in 2009, the highway patrol reported.

Rep. Don Wells, R-Cabool, who sponsored another bill (HB 1276) that would have outlawed texting by all drivers, said of the existing teen ban: “That’s like saying, ‘You can kill yourself if you’re over 21.’ ” Wells owns a defensive driving school.

The Missouri State Highway Patrol launched an anti-text messaging campaign in July. The campaign’s logo features a “no texting” design. MSHP is offering window-cling decals to the public. Con-way Freight, a major employer in Missouri, promoted the campaign by featuring the no-texting logo on its Ford Fusion race car. (Con-Way prohibits texting by its drivers). Adults, however, are allowed to drive and text message in Missouri, party due to law officers’ concerns over enforcement. The highway patrol asked older drivers to “honor the letter and the spirit of the law.”

The superintendent of the Missouri Highway Patrol said Jan. 19 that only 13 tickets had been written as a result of the Missouri ban on texting by teenage drivers. Most came during accident investigations.

Missouri’s Department of Transportation has banned text messaging by its employees. The department is supporting efforts to outlaw texting for all Missouri drivers.

2009 legislation:

HB 62: Wide-ranging crime bill that includes a ban on text messaging while driving for drivers under the age of 21. Approved by the House and Senate and signed by the governor as part of an omnibus crime bill. Enforcement began Aug. 28.

SB 130: Would ban the sending of text messages while operating motor vehicles. The legislation against texting while driving was approved by the full Missouri Senate on March 11, 2009, after it was added to a larger transportation bill.

HB 26: Would prohibit use of handheld cell phones by motorists. Permits hands-free.

HB 92: Would prohibit drivers from using cell phones unless a hands-free attachment was employed.

HB 134: Would outlaw drivers’ use of cell phones unless a hands-free device was employed. Bans text messaging of all types.

SB 129: Would prevent school bus drivers from text messaging and using handheld phones.

2009 legislation notes:
Sen. Ryan McKenna, D-Crystal City, was the sponsor of both Senate bills.

Sen. McKenna saw his SB 130, which would ban text messages by motorists, approved by the Senate on March 11 after it was folded into a comprehensive transportation bill. It cleared the Senate Transportation Committee on Feb. 18.

Sen. Tom Dempsey, R-St. Peters, has been frustrated in past years with his cell phone safety legislation. He cites a “civil libertarian component” at work in the state, as found in resistance to laws requiring motorcycle helmets and seat belts, according to the Columbia Daily Tribune.

Cell phone bill sponsor Rep. Joe Smith is a Republican from St. Charles County. He sponsored a similar bill in 2008. Smith said many people can dial without looking, but that “basically we need a better system with dialing.”

Rep. Talibdin El-Amin, D-St. Louis, sponsor of HB 92, says of his constituents: “They know they talk on the phone and they know of a time they have been distracted. And then you hear the stories of people who have been killed because of it, and one is too many.”

The vice-chairman of the transportation committee indicated that it might not get around to the issues of electronic communications by drivers. “There is only so much time to get bills through,” said state Rep. Sally Faith, R-St. Charles.

Springfield reports that of the 146 crash reports in 2008, 44 percent of the crashes were due to cell phone use.

A Town and Country, Mo., alderman failed to find support for a city ordinance against driving and cell phoning. City lawmakers refused to take up the plan in August 2008, saying the issue needs to be addressed at the state level.

Alderman John Hoffmann told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch: “With a number of cell phone companies giving campaign contributions through straw parties and directly this isn’t about to hit the Missouri Legislature anytime soon for a vote.”

The local police commission urged the aldermen to instead push the state and county for a ban on cell phone use by drivers.

Comments

  1. My 2 year old cousin was put into a medical induced coma after having every bone in her face broken from an accident where their car was hit by a texting driver. She still cannot move her left side, and has trouble remembering things, along with side effects of shaken baby syndrome from moderate brain damage.

    The man who hit them is over the age of 21. Because of this, no legal action can be taken against him unless she would have died. Since he does not have insurance, my uncle will end up paying the hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills alone.

    The driver gets out unscathed, because he’s over 21. That is not okay.

  2. Hope more people get punished for texting and driving

  3. Missouri needs to get their butts in gear and ban text messaging while driving. Other states have made it texting illegal, why hasnt Missouri? If Missouri claims to be in the bible belt then think of others. Im from Detroit, now live in Springfield Mo, and its very illegal up there. Very sad our government just doesnt care!

  4. There are bans on texting and driving for people under 21 but how do you think kids learn that it is ok to do that hummmmm? From older people, genius. … So pass it for everyone or no one and I see more police officers on the phone so the people who should enforce it are doing it themselves great example so what the old saying do as i say not as i do so BS it just shows how irresponsible people are and how they value life.

  5. Not only do I believe no one should be texting while driving, I also believe no cell phone should be used unless it’s hands free! It’s a real shame to think that someone could die because someone was too cheap to spend less than $10 on a Bluetooth! If we went to one of the major Bluetooth suppliers and asked them to create a incentive plan to show their support of Bluetooth usage, it could be a win-win for everyone involved!

  6. Aaron Hughes says

    I think texting and driving needs to be banned in all states. I’m writing a research paper about teens texting and I’m completely against it for all ages. After seeing some of the stats I’ve been able to find I can’t believe that it hasn’t been made a law yet.

    • Aaron —- its been 2 years since your post. How did your research paper turn out? Also, its been 2 years that legislation, is still sitting on bills introduced and yet to make any progress on toughing laws regarding Driving and Texting/cell phone use

  7. Robert Fleming says

    Please do the right thing and pass the necessary laws to prevent such tragic accidents from happening.

    For those who think their freedoms are threatened by passing such laws, I remind them driving is not a right protected by the Consitution (they didn’t have cars back then), it is a privelege a citizen must responsibly earn and maintain.

  8. Mike Becker says

    We do NOT need more laws for texting and driving. We have a law in place– Careless and imprudent— . This law covers texting and any other dumb thing people do while driving. Quit passing more laws, enforce the ones we have!!!!!

  9. I’m just frustrated they are only targeting one distraction. If distractions are dangerous, then it should not be limited to one means–all distractions should carry the same consequences, from texting to using an iPad to putting on make-up. It’s wrong to single out one and not the others because it dilutes the reason behind the ban.

    • Apparently you text behind the wheel and use your cell phone, beings that you’re getting defensive about the article.

  10. Claudia Knudten says

    texting while driving is just dumb, maybe they should do a study of the IQ’s of the average person who engages in this! Car and driver used 2 professional drivers in a study and proved that their reaction times while texting were 8x what they were normally, they compared this to the reaction times of the same drivers legally drunk, which was only 4x normal. Wake up people!

    The argument of government controlling our actions blah, blah… is completely without merit. Should we then be free to commit homicide, rape, robbery (maybe steal the cell phones of the idiots texting while they drive).

    If you hit and harm me, or someone I care about texting while driving (or doing some other stupid thing), you better have a damn good lawyer because I WILL sue you for every penny I can get. How would you feel if your child, sister, brother, mother or father were the one killed? How would feel if you kill someone else’s loved one – and you live – because you’re texting and driving? And then you see them in court, and they get to give a victim impact statement…. that will be fun (only if you are a sociopath).

    PS Both the prosecutors and civil attorneys are getting cell phone records for drivers involved in injury/fatality accidents. A recent test case in MO charged a driver texting involved in a fatal crash with homicide after his cell phone records proved he was texting.

    At least give me a logical argument and back it up with some facts… don’t just quote some historical antigovernment rhetoric …. that doesn’t make you intelligent – it just proves you know how to copy.

  11. My brother works for the state hiway dept in another state, and has had many close calls from drivers. One in particular was a woman using her Ipad while driving, what was so important that it could not wait for her to wait? My phone is off while driving, friends and family know that, I check in when I am not behind the wheel to check msgs or return calls. I know this will proably not mean a thing to some but it means a lot to me when my sibling is out there putting his life on the line on the hiway!!!!

  12. Harold Eugene Johnson says

    In Nineteen Eighty-Four, a 1949 dystopian novel by George Orwell, the individual is always subordinated to the state, and it is in part this philosophy which allows the Party to manipulate and control humanity.

    Currently, the state wants to extend their control of humanity … to cell phone text messages. And, while some people seem to agree, it is time to remember … “The price of freedom … isn’t free”.

    “Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. When change is absolute there remains no being to improve and no direction is set for possible improvement: and when experience is not retained, as among savages, infancy is perpetual. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” — quote from The Life of Reason (1905-1906) by George Santayana

    Reference, also, The Noble Experiment (1920 – 1933): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_in_the_United_States

  13. All cell phone usage should be banned while driving. My dad taught me to drive like everyone else was a nut. In other words, drive defensively which means I am aware of everything a half a mile ahead of me. Impossible to do if ones attenton is on a cell phone.

  14. I think texting while driving needs to be gotten rid of all together! It puts all of us at risk!

    28% of the car accidents have been caused by texting! Thats unacceptable!

  15. My Uncle was just killed in an auto accident by texting young adults under the age of 20.

    I hope they make an example of the situation and press on so more lives are not lost in this manner.

Post a comment, join the conversation

*