South Carolina: Cell phone laws, legislation

Last updated: June 1, 2010 · Print this report

state flagCell phone, texting news: The South Carolina House approved a ban on text messaging while driving March 11. The bill was sent to the Senate, where a panel advanced a separate distracted driving bill.

Current prohibitions:
No limits on cell phone use.

2009-2010 legislation:
HB 4282: Would prohibit texting and use of hand-held phones on South Carolina roads and highways. Fine of $25, no points. The House approved the bill (91-18 vote, March 11) and sent it to the Senate, where it was assigned to a transportation subcommittee. (D.C. Smith)

South Carolina Senate Bill 642: For drivers under the age of 18, would outlaw use of cell phones or other wireless communications devices. Approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee on Feb. 16. (T. Alexander)

South Carolina House Bill 4259: Would outlaw text messaging while driving on South Carolina’s roads. Provides for fines from $250-$2,500, imprisonment from 30 days to 20 years (in case of death) and 2-4 points against the driver’s license (J.E. Smith)

HB 4206: Provides for introduction of cell phones as evidence in civil cases resulting from accidents that were allegedly caused by drivers who were cell phoning or text messaging (G.R. Smith)

SB 970: Would prohibit sending or reading of text messages while driving. Calls for secondary enforcement, meaning officers would need another reason to stop violators. Fines of $25. (Bryant)

HB 4189: Would outlaw text messaging while driving. Also bans reading of print materials. Provides fines of up to $10,000 (for third violations), plus possible prison terms and license suspensions. For causing a death while text messaging, a prison term of up to 25 years is proposed. Law officers may seize and review drivers’ cell phones for evidence of texting. (Bowen)

HB 4190: Would ban use of handheld communications devices while operating a motor vehicle on South Carolina roads. Calls for fines of $125 and assessment of 2 points against the driving record. (Sellers)

SB 991: Would ban text messaging by all drivers (Rose)

SB 954: Would ban drivers over the age of 18 from using cellular phones or wireless devices without a hands-free device. Drivers under 18 would be prohibited from using cellular phones or wireless devices entirely. Calls for secondary enforcement. In the Senate Transportation Committee. (Rankin)

Legislation notes:
HB 4282, which sailed through the House, was amended to lower its fine to $25. The original measure called for $100 fines and 2 points on violators’ drivers licenses.

Rep. Don Bowen, R-Anderson, is the sponsor of South Carolina House Bill 4189, which could be the strictest text messaging legislation seen to date. The provision that allows law officers to seize cell phones and examine them on the spot is sure to attract civil liberties resistance. Prison terms for distracted driving are rarely included in similar legislation, but each instance of texting while driving brings the possibility of incarceration under Bowen’s text messaging proposals.

Clemson’s ban on text messaging and driving went into effect June 1. Clemson’s City Council voted unanimously for the law on Feb. 15 after initial approval on Feb. 1. Fine is $100 plus court costs. Clemson’s mayor originally wanted a ban on hands-free cell phone use as well as text messaging. This was the first city in South Carolina to ban texting while behind the wheel.

Camden’s ban on texting while driving has gone into effect, with tickets costing as much as $250.

Charleston’s mayor is pushing through an ordinance that would ban texting in city limits.

Mount Pleasant decided to retreat on a plan for a ban on texting and driving, with the Town Council returning the measure to the judicial committee on April 13. The move came after a public hearing in which three of five residents opposed the ban.

South Carolina’s Department of Transportation and Department of Public Safety have banned text messaging while on the job. The move affects about 6,500 staffers.

2008-2009 legislation (expired or defeated)

HB 4501 and SB 1133 (identical): Prohibits drivers from using cell phones unless hands-free devices are employed. Includes PDAs, pagers and “another wireless communication device.”

SB 402: Would allow municipalities to limit drivers’ cell phone use to hands-free operation.

Legislation notes (2008-2009):

The state House on April 30, 2008, sent back to committee a bill by Rep. Lanny Littlejohn, R-Spartanburg, that would have prohibited teens with restricted licenses from using cell phones or texting while driving.

“The House just isn’t ready for this kind of legislation,” Littlejohn told the Island Packet. “I think, subconsciously, they’re afraid that the bill would eventually lead to cell phones being banned outright for all drivers.”

The debate touched on hand held phones vs. hands-free devices: “It’s illegal to put a phone up to their ear, but it’s perfectly legal for them to go down the road with a Bluetooth in their ear?” asked Rep. Mick Mulvaney, R-Indian Land.

In September ’08, the Beaufort City Council was in the process of adopting a ban on use of cell phones by drivers unless they use a handheld device. The council acted because of a lack of statewide action. The ordinance would be enforced if the driver has been in an accident or has been pulled over for another offense.

Share this report:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Comments

2 Responses to “South Carolina: Cell phone laws, legislation”

  1. Sandra Burleson on March 12th, 2010 6:49 am

    I agree with the ban on using phones, for either texting or sending and receiving calls while driving. I am concerned about emergencies, though. For example, my daughter may be stranded somewhere and needs me to pick her up. The cell phone is a God-send in these instances. The law should allow for hands free usages and for using phones while pulled off on the side of the road. This would allow my daughter to call me, then I could either answer using a hands-free device or pulling off the road to receive/return the call. The cell phone, if used responsibly, prevents many hardships and allows for more security. I know there is a lot of abuse, but there should be some allowance for responsible use.

  2. Lou Fowler on March 28th, 2010 10:38 am

    I can’ take it anymore . . . I’ve had it up to here . . . dodging “Idiots” on our roads with a cell phone stuck in their ear; texing and using electronic devices while driving.

    As you enter the gates of Fort Jackson you will find signs reading “NO ELECTRONIC DEVICES WHILE DRIVING.” The army is concerned with the safety of our troops; why then should you and our legislature not be concerned with the safety of us citizens?

    I survived WWII with two Purple Hearts; and was a POW for 13 months of the Germans. I dodged many German bullets, and I don’t intend to leave this world by the hands of irresponsible drivers.

    I am a good driver. I obey the laws because I respect the laws. You will not find any points against my record. I will challenge anyone with my past and present driving ability. Especially, I am a very good defensive driver, with lots of experience, dodging “idiot drivers” on our roads.

    Please, do what is right . . . push through a law “NO ELECTRONIC DEVICES WHILE DRIVING”. Don’t be influenced by lobbyist who don’t give a
    “Doodle Squat” about you or me.

Have something to say? We want to hear what you think about distracted driving laws and legislation -- pro, con or undecided.





Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes