<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Jersey: Cell phone laws, legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://handsfreeinfo.com/new-jersey-cell-phone-laws-legislation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/new-jersey-cell-phone-laws-legislation</link>
	<description>Text messaging, distracted driving safety</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 21:18:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cinamon</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/new-jersey-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-15241</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cinamon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 06:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=95#comment-15241</guid>
		<description>Excuse me.  The stupid elected officials are catering to voters like you.  They&#039;re afraid you might vote them out of office if they do something YOU don&#039;t like.  If you had any smarts you would know that this &quot;low level&quot; problem is akin to drinking and driving.  Talking on a phone carries the same threat as DWI.  But, you see, they didn&#039;t ban &quot;talking&quot; on a phone, just holding the phone, which is absurd.

But, i guess since we don&#039;t want a nanny state we shouldn&#039;t have any laws infringing our liberty.  We should be allowed to run red lights, stop signs, drive drunk and even kill people who get in our way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me.  The stupid elected officials are catering to voters like you.  They&#8217;re afraid you might vote them out of office if they do something YOU don&#8217;t like.  If you had any smarts you would know that this &#8220;low level&#8221; problem is akin to drinking and driving.  Talking on a phone carries the same threat as DWI.  But, you see, they didn&#8217;t ban &#8220;talking&#8221; on a phone, just holding the phone, which is absurd.</p>
<p>But, i guess since we don&#8217;t want a nanny state we shouldn&#8217;t have any laws infringing our liberty.  We should be allowed to run red lights, stop signs, drive drunk and even kill people who get in our way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Johnson</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/new-jersey-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-15155</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=95#comment-15155</guid>
		<description>William J. Coburn, you are out of your mind.. No state or Fed government should have the authority to (confiscation of the vehicle for all subsequent violations) because of a low level law like this.. This type of penalties should be placed on DUI / DWI drivers.. People like you are the reason why we have stupid elected officials in office…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William J. Coburn, you are out of your mind.. No state or Fed government should have the authority to (confiscation of the vehicle for all subsequent violations) because of a low level law like this.. This type of penalties should be placed on DUI / DWI drivers.. People like you are the reason why we have stupid elected officials in office…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cinamon</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/new-jersey-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-11042</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cinamon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=95#comment-11042</guid>
		<description>If the NTSB recommendation inspired these bills, why are they still only proposing to ban hand-held phones?  The &quot;hypocrisy&quot; as outline by Chairwoman Hersman,  obviously continues to flourish in New Jersey and elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the NTSB recommendation inspired these bills, why are they still only proposing to ban hand-held phones?  The &#8220;hypocrisy&#8221; as outline by Chairwoman Hersman,  obviously continues to flourish in New Jersey and elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William J. Coburn</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/new-jersey-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-9106</link>
		<dc:creator>William J. Coburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 05:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=95#comment-9106</guid>
		<description>I favor tougher penalties for using cellphones or blackberries while driving. I favor $1000 for the first offense, $5000 for the second, and $10,000 and confiscation of the vehicle for all subsequent violations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I favor tougher penalties for using cellphones or blackberries while driving. I favor $1000 for the first offense, $5000 for the second, and $10,000 and confiscation of the vehicle for all subsequent violations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: handsfreeinfo.com @ 2012-05-21 05:32:19 -->
