<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michigan: Cellular phone laws, bills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://handsfreeinfo.com/michigan-cell-phone-laws-legislation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/michigan-cell-phone-laws-legislation</link>
	<description>Text messaging, distracted driving safety</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:44:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/michigan-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-9525</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 02:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=76#comment-9525</guid>
		<description>RLT: DOT has banned use of handheld cell phones by interstate truckers and bus drivers. Feds can&#039;t enact a broad cell phone law. Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RLT: DOT has banned use of handheld cell phones by interstate truckers and bus drivers. Feds can&#8217;t enact a broad cell phone law. Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RLT</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/michigan-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-9510</link>
		<dc:creator>RLT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=76#comment-9510</guid>
		<description>RT, and Smeltzer, you are correct. It&#039;s the pompous, arrogant, lawmakers that make these rediculous laws and are chauffeured around while they talk on their phones. Another nail in the small business coffin too. Just heard the feds have enacted a law starting 1/3/12 banning phones. Someday maybe folks will get enough of this and do what has to be done to stop these idiots in power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT, and Smeltzer, you are correct. It&#8217;s the pompous, arrogant, lawmakers that make these rediculous laws and are chauffeured around while they talk on their phones. Another nail in the small business coffin too. Just heard the feds have enacted a law starting 1/3/12 banning phones. Someday maybe folks will get enough of this and do what has to be done to stop these idiots in power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Smeltzer</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/michigan-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-9250</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Smeltzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=76#comment-9250</guid>
		<description>State Law Makers should think long and hard about these cell phone laws. First talking on a cell phone while driving is no more of a hazard then talking to a passenger sitting next to the driver.

What&#039;s next, outlaw talking to your passenger while driving? Making the police &quot;Platinum Citizens?&quot; i.e. give the police exemption from the law while everyone else pays fines or does jail time?
Isn&#039;t there enough bad will between the general public and law enforcement already?

While making illegal the act of &quot;texting while driving&quot; is a reasonable law, because it requires distractions from watching where your going down the road. That should be enough on use of cell phone regulation, while driving. If and emergency occurred either at home or work or while driving, most drivers would become more of a road hazard if forced to pull over or stop in traffic. Have you ever seen cops the TV program where the police where pulled over and became a driving distraction to the point where other drivers where rubber necking and hit the squad car and the cop? I have.

Just because some citizens have a hard time walking and chewing gum at the same time, doesn&#039;t mean the rest of us suffer under new unreasonable laws. Laws most of the population will resent and make that resentment felt at the polls sooner or later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>State Law Makers should think long and hard about these cell phone laws. First talking on a cell phone while driving is no more of a hazard then talking to a passenger sitting next to the driver.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s next, outlaw talking to your passenger while driving? Making the police &#8220;Platinum Citizens?&#8221; i.e. give the police exemption from the law while everyone else pays fines or does jail time?<br />
Isn&#8217;t there enough bad will between the general public and law enforcement already?</p>
<p>While making illegal the act of &#8220;texting while driving&#8221; is a reasonable law, because it requires distractions from watching where your going down the road. That should be enough on use of cell phone regulation, while driving. If and emergency occurred either at home or work or while driving, most drivers would become more of a road hazard if forced to pull over or stop in traffic. Have you ever seen cops the TV program where the police where pulled over and became a driving distraction to the point where other drivers where rubber necking and hit the squad car and the cop? I have.</p>
<p>Just because some citizens have a hard time walking and chewing gum at the same time, doesn&#8217;t mean the rest of us suffer under new unreasonable laws. Laws most of the population will resent and make that resentment felt at the polls sooner or later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivia</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/michigan-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-5078</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 09:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=76#comment-5078</guid>
		<description>I would like to see cell phone use by drivers in moving vehicles banned, period. No talking, no texting, no nothing. As someone above noted, a huge percentage of drivers have not a lick of sense and cannot discipline themselves to do the safe thing regarding cell phone use while driving a car. Most of the worst offenders can&#039;t drive worth a damn anyway; add texting and chatting about inanities to that handicap and you have trouble waiting to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see cell phone use by drivers in moving vehicles banned, period. No talking, no texting, no nothing. As someone above noted, a huge percentage of drivers have not a lick of sense and cannot discipline themselves to do the safe thing regarding cell phone use while driving a car. Most of the worst offenders can&#8217;t drive worth a damn anyway; add texting and chatting about inanities to that handicap and you have trouble waiting to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RR</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/michigan-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-3157</link>
		<dc:creator>RR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=76#comment-3157</guid>
		<description>Wow, I&#039;m surprised at all the complaining about a law meant to make driving safer. Well, lets look at it this way, the law is in effect, and there isn&#039;t any politician that is going to repeal it, so quit crying about it and deal with the tickets you get for being dumb. I for one am glad to see this law in effect because I see so many people drifting on the highway due to texting, and when I honk at them, they act as if they did nothing wrong. News Flash, you endanger someone&#039;s life, you sure as hell did something wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I&#8217;m surprised at all the complaining about a law meant to make driving safer. Well, lets look at it this way, the law is in effect, and there isn&#8217;t any politician that is going to repeal it, so quit crying about it and deal with the tickets you get for being dumb. I for one am glad to see this law in effect because I see so many people drifting on the highway due to texting, and when I honk at them, they act as if they did nothing wrong. News Flash, you endanger someone&#8217;s life, you sure as hell did something wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RT</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/michigan-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-2239</link>
		<dc:creator>RT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 04:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=76#comment-2239</guid>
		<description>The only people that should be allowed to use cell phones and text while driving are the political elite because they&#039;re much more intelligent than the normal shmuck-on-the-street.  It&#039;s just like why only cops should have guns . . . because they&#039;re so much more intelligent and capable than mere citizens.

  Actually, now that I think about it, only the political elite of the politbureau should be allowed to have cars (which, of course, should be paid for by the people).  And, the political elite should also probably have lifetime pensions equal to twice whatever it was they were paid when they were in governmental service for all the fantastic work they did while in office.  After all, it&#039;s only fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only people that should be allowed to use cell phones and text while driving are the political elite because they&#8217;re much more intelligent than the normal shmuck-on-the-street.  It&#8217;s just like why only cops should have guns . . . because they&#8217;re so much more intelligent and capable than mere citizens.</p>
<p>  Actually, now that I think about it, only the political elite of the politbureau should be allowed to have cars (which, of course, should be paid for by the people).  And, the political elite should also probably have lifetime pensions equal to twice whatever it was they were paid when they were in governmental service for all the fantastic work they did while in office.  After all, it&#8217;s only fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rho</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/michigan-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-2163</link>
		<dc:creator>Rho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 00:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=76#comment-2163</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just another way to get money from us.  They say it&#039;s to save lives, but let&#039;s face it, the state is hurting for money and fines are just another means of revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just another way to get money from us.  They say it&#8217;s to save lives, but let&#8217;s face it, the state is hurting for money and fines are just another means of revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/michigan-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-2081</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=76#comment-2081</guid>
		<description>On the news last night, Channel 7 interviewed a police officer as he was pulling over drivers &amp; gave them warnings about the new law going into effect today.  When the reporter asked the officer how he would know who to pull over, he responded he could tell based on drivers looking down, or driving a bit slower than the rest of the cars, or that a lot of times texters will weave a bit near the median.  He said these were all signs of distracted driving.

My concern is what if someone is just changing the radio station, or simply reaching for a kleenex?  The officer can still pull the driver over.  And then what?  Will the officer actually admit they&#039;ve made a mistake?  And how are they expecting to prove you were texting?

My cell is usually in the cup holder, located in my center console.  But, just because it&#039;s sitting there doesn&#039;t mean I&#039;m using it.  I actually don&#039;t text/drive, but I do answer the phone when it rings.  And I usually look at the screen before I answer it, just in case it&#039;s someone that can wait until I&#039;m not driving.

My point is, I&#039;m wondering where the police will actually draw the line on this law?  As I said above, if the officer mistakes you reaching for a kleenex as texting, will he admit he&#039;s wrong &amp; let you go?  Or will he give you a ticket anyway for distracted driving?

Just wondering...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the news last night, Channel 7 interviewed a police officer as he was pulling over drivers &amp; gave them warnings about the new law going into effect today.  When the reporter asked the officer how he would know who to pull over, he responded he could tell based on drivers looking down, or driving a bit slower than the rest of the cars, or that a lot of times texters will weave a bit near the median.  He said these were all signs of distracted driving.</p>
<p>My concern is what if someone is just changing the radio station, or simply reaching for a kleenex?  The officer can still pull the driver over.  And then what?  Will the officer actually admit they&#8217;ve made a mistake?  And how are they expecting to prove you were texting?</p>
<p>My cell is usually in the cup holder, located in my center console.  But, just because it&#8217;s sitting there doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m using it.  I actually don&#8217;t text/drive, but I do answer the phone when it rings.  And I usually look at the screen before I answer it, just in case it&#8217;s someone that can wait until I&#8217;m not driving.</p>
<p>My point is, I&#8217;m wondering where the police will actually draw the line on this law?  As I said above, if the officer mistakes you reaching for a kleenex as texting, will he admit he&#8217;s wrong &amp; let you go?  Or will he give you a ticket anyway for distracted driving?</p>
<p>Just wondering&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/michigan-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-2074</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=76#comment-2074</guid>
		<description>We add law after law attempting to control what people do and legislate intelligence and common sense.  Tragically, we systematically remove the need and even desire to take responsibility for our actions.

The fact is we should realize that by accepting our license to drive and getting behind the wheel we are responsible for doing all we can to not harm anything or damage property. It&#039;s already the law we don&#039;t need to make a whole bunch of little laws if we just uphold and enforce that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We add law after law attempting to control what people do and legislate intelligence and common sense.  Tragically, we systematically remove the need and even desire to take responsibility for our actions.</p>
<p>The fact is we should realize that by accepting our license to drive and getting behind the wheel we are responsible for doing all we can to not harm anything or damage property. It&#8217;s already the law we don&#8217;t need to make a whole bunch of little laws if we just uphold and enforce that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kara</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/michigan-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-2070</link>
		<dc:creator>Kara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 07:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=76#comment-2070</guid>
		<description>Can everyone please read Kim&#039;s comment again?  This legislation will NOT stop people from texting/emailing/IMing/etc. while driving.  People will just do it in a way that is more discreet = more focus on their hand &amp; phone and less focus on the road.  In my opinion, changing the radio station or finding a good station is more distracting for me than when I&#039;m texting (pushing buttons that I don&#039;t even have to look at on my phone for).  Should changing the radio be illegal too?

And Ant, please tell your motorcycle buddies to stop swerving in and out between me and the safe distance I&#039;ve created in relation to the car in front of me.  Lives are being lost because of this too.  I&#039;ve lost friends to a car/motorcycle accident where it was the motorcyclist&#039;s fault.

&quot;If this legislation saves just one life it is worth everyone’s [inconvenience].&quot;  Well I say make motorcycles illegal, it&#039;s only an inconvenience that could save at least one life, right? Motorcycles are more dangerous than most cars and when purchasing this type of vehicle, the concept should be understood that driving a motorcycle comes with greater risk.

With this legislation, the amount of texting will stay the same but accidents will only further increase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can everyone please read Kim&#8217;s comment again?  This legislation will NOT stop people from texting/emailing/IMing/etc. while driving.  People will just do it in a way that is more discreet = more focus on their hand &amp; phone and less focus on the road.  In my opinion, changing the radio station or finding a good station is more distracting for me than when I&#8217;m texting (pushing buttons that I don&#8217;t even have to look at on my phone for).  Should changing the radio be illegal too?</p>
<p>And Ant, please tell your motorcycle buddies to stop swerving in and out between me and the safe distance I&#8217;ve created in relation to the car in front of me.  Lives are being lost because of this too.  I&#8217;ve lost friends to a car/motorcycle accident where it was the motorcyclist&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>&#8220;If this legislation saves just one life it is worth everyone’s [inconvenience].&#8221;  Well I say make motorcycles illegal, it&#8217;s only an inconvenience that could save at least one life, right? Motorcycles are more dangerous than most cars and when purchasing this type of vehicle, the concept should be understood that driving a motorcycle comes with greater risk.</p>
<p>With this legislation, the amount of texting will stay the same but accidents will only further increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: handsfreeinfo.com @ 2012-02-07 12:24:28 -->
