<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Massachusetts: Cell phone laws, legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://handsfreeinfo.com/massachusetts-cell-phone-laws-legislation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/massachusetts-cell-phone-laws-legislation</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:14:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/massachusetts-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=74#comment-978</guid>
		<description>Recently moved to the Boston area from NY and very surprised that there is no law against cellphone usage. I bought a new car and automatically put in a hands free cellphone device. I am shocked at how many people drive and speak on the phone. I can tell right away by the way they are driving and always right when I pull up next to them.

I do not want to be a statistic and I don&#039;t think anyone should be. We might as well let people drive drunk as far as I am concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently moved to the Boston area from NY and very surprised that there is no law against cellphone usage. I bought a new car and automatically put in a hands free cellphone device. I am shocked at how many people drive and speak on the phone. I can tell right away by the way they are driving and always right when I pull up next to them.</p>
<p>I do not want to be a statistic and I don&#8217;t think anyone should be. We might as well let people drive drunk as far as I am concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Viglirolo</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/massachusetts-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>George Viglirolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 02:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=74#comment-906</guid>
		<description>Here are five brief excerpts (from among many other well-documented studies) that make it clear why there should be a ban on all cell phone use (hand-held or hands-free devices) while operating a motor vehicle.  Thanks for reading.

	
Study 1 [3/13/2002] http://www.nsc.org/issues/idrive/inincell.htm

Study participants who engaged in cell phone conversations missed twice as many simulated traffic signals as when they were not talking on the cell phone. They also took longer to react to those signals that they did detect.  These deficits were equivalent for both hand-held and hands-free cell phone users.

Cellular phone use disrupts performance by diverting attention to an engaging cognitive context other than the one immediately associated with driving.

Legislative initiatives that restrict hand-held devices but permit hands-free devices are not likely to reduce interference from the phone conversation, because the interference is due to central attentional processes.


Study 2 [7/23/2003] http://www.healingsearch.com/Health%20News/Cell%20Phone%20Driving%20Like%20Being%20Drunk.htm

A study published in 1997 in the New England Journal of Medicine, based on accident data in Toronto, found that the risk of driving and using a cell phone was similar to that when driving drunk.  The risk of a collision was three to six times higher than when a driver was sober and not using a cell phone.

In a new study, researchers from the University of Utah conclude that talking on a cell phone behind the wheel is more dangerous than driving drunk.  And it makes no difference whether the telephone is hand-held or used hands-free. 



Study 3 [12/9/2005] http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/12/051209113320.htm

The study [of multi-tasking] can be applied to drivers who talk on cell phones. On the surface, it appears that drivers are trying to accomplish just two tasks – driving and conversing.  But each task is complicated and multi-faceted, greatly increasing the &quot;cost&quot; of switching. The result: inattention and slow reaction times.

&quot;A lot of people think talking on the cell phone while driving is natural, but each time someone asks a question or changes the subject, it&#039;s like taking on a new task.  It requires a certain amount of thought and preparation. It&#039;s actually quite different than listening to the radio, where you don&#039;t need to respond.&quot;

&quot;And it&#039;s also different from talking to a passenger in the vehicle.  In most cases, a passenger can observe when there is a dangerous traffic situation and keep quiet.  But someone calling you on a cell phone won&#039;t have a clue.&quot;


Study 4 [6/30/2006] http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,201586,00.html

Driving while talking on a cell phone is as bad as, or maybe worse, than driving drunk. 

The study is detailed in the summer 2006 issue of Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.  It is the first peer-reviewed study on this topic to include drinking.

&quot;Just like you put yourself and other people at risk when you drive drunk, you put yourself and others at risk when you use a cell phone and drive.  The level of impairment is very similar.&quot;


Study 5 [1/2008] http://www.psych.utah.edu/AppliedCognitionLab/

A University of Utah study found that conversation -- and not the use of hands-free phone devices -- is the main distraction while driving and talking on cell phones.

New research showed that the cars of drivers talking on cell phones tended to move slower and, thus, caused traffic to show down.

The costs of delay and traffic jams can be deceptively high. &quot;If we compile the millions of drivers distracted by cell phones and their small delays, and convert them to dollars, the costs are likely to be dramatic.  Cell phones cost us dearly.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are five brief excerpts (from among many other well-documented studies) that make it clear why there should be a ban on all cell phone use (hand-held or hands-free devices) while operating a motor vehicle.  Thanks for reading.</p>
<p>Study 1 [3/13/2002] <a href="http://www.nsc.org/issues/idrive/inincell.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nsc.org/issues/idrive/inincell.htm</a></p>
<p>Study participants who engaged in cell phone conversations missed twice as many simulated traffic signals as when they were not talking on the cell phone. They also took longer to react to those signals that they did detect.  These deficits were equivalent for both hand-held and hands-free cell phone users.</p>
<p>Cellular phone use disrupts performance by diverting attention to an engaging cognitive context other than the one immediately associated with driving.</p>
<p>Legislative initiatives that restrict hand-held devices but permit hands-free devices are not likely to reduce interference from the phone conversation, because the interference is due to central attentional processes.</p>
<p>Study 2 [7/23/2003] <a href="http://www.healingsearch.com/Health%20News/Cell%20Phone%20Driving%20Like%20Being%20Drunk.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.healingsearch.com/Health%20News/Cell%20Phone%20Driving%20Like%20Being%20Drunk.htm</a></p>
<p>A study published in 1997 in the New England Journal of Medicine, based on accident data in Toronto, found that the risk of driving and using a cell phone was similar to that when driving drunk.  The risk of a collision was three to six times higher than when a driver was sober and not using a cell phone.</p>
<p>In a new study, researchers from the University of Utah conclude that talking on a cell phone behind the wheel is more dangerous than driving drunk.  And it makes no difference whether the telephone is hand-held or used hands-free. </p>
<p>Study 3 [12/9/2005] <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/12/051209113320.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/12/051209113320.htm</a></p>
<p>The study [of multi-tasking] can be applied to drivers who talk on cell phones. On the surface, it appears that drivers are trying to accomplish just two tasks – driving and conversing.  But each task is complicated and multi-faceted, greatly increasing the &#8220;cost&#8221; of switching. The result: inattention and slow reaction times.</p>
<p>&#8220;A lot of people think talking on the cell phone while driving is natural, but each time someone asks a question or changes the subject, it&#8217;s like taking on a new task.  It requires a certain amount of thought and preparation. It&#8217;s actually quite different than listening to the radio, where you don&#8217;t need to respond.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;And it&#8217;s also different from talking to a passenger in the vehicle.  In most cases, a passenger can observe when there is a dangerous traffic situation and keep quiet.  But someone calling you on a cell phone won&#8217;t have a clue.&#8221;</p>
<p>Study 4 [6/30/2006] <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,201586,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,201586,00.html</a></p>
<p>Driving while talking on a cell phone is as bad as, or maybe worse, than driving drunk. </p>
<p>The study is detailed in the summer 2006 issue of Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.  It is the first peer-reviewed study on this topic to include drinking.</p>
<p>&#8220;Just like you put yourself and other people at risk when you drive drunk, you put yourself and others at risk when you use a cell phone and drive.  The level of impairment is very similar.&#8221;</p>
<p>Study 5 [1/2008] <a href="http://www.psych.utah.edu/AppliedCognitionLab/" rel="nofollow">http://www.psych.utah.edu/AppliedCognitionLab/</a></p>
<p>A University of Utah study found that conversation &#8212; and not the use of hands-free phone devices &#8212; is the main distraction while driving and talking on cell phones.</p>
<p>New research showed that the cars of drivers talking on cell phones tended to move slower and, thus, caused traffic to show down.</p>
<p>The costs of delay and traffic jams can be deceptively high. &#8220;If we compile the millions of drivers distracted by cell phones and their small delays, and convert them to dollars, the costs are likely to be dramatic.  Cell phones cost us dearly.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Patterson</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/massachusetts-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 22:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=74#comment-818</guid>
		<description>So you are saying that it was the legislatures fault for not making it illegal to use a cell phone while driving?  That is borderline ludicrous.  It is traumatic what happened to your sister, and nobody should have to deal with that situation either personally or with a family member.  But, that being said, bottom line is that it was clearly her fault, and not the legislatures for not making it illegal.  Is there a law that says, &quot;Don&#039;t stick your tongue in a electric socket, and if somebody is dumb enough to do it, is ti the legislatures fault for not making a law, ordinance, or statute to prevent such activity?  What ever happened to freedom of choice and all that rhetoric that is quickly being thrown out the window at every opportunity.  Is it not bad enough that you are tracked daily by your credit accounts and use of your social security number, and the fact that you already have minimal, and I say that laughingly, rights as a civilian when a police officer pull you over, that you want to give them more reasons to do it?  Think about the consequences of what you ask before you do.  The right to privacy  outweighs anything to be gained from a ban of cell phone use in a vehicle.  Its already bad enough that I am forced against my will, with no threat to anyone else, to wear a seatbelt, and if I don&#039;t, greedy insurance companies can charge me higher premiums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you are saying that it was the legislatures fault for not making it illegal to use a cell phone while driving?  That is borderline ludicrous.  It is traumatic what happened to your sister, and nobody should have to deal with that situation either personally or with a family member.  But, that being said, bottom line is that it was clearly her fault, and not the legislatures for not making it illegal.  Is there a law that says, &#8220;Don&#8217;t stick your tongue in a electric socket, and if somebody is dumb enough to do it, is ti the legislatures fault for not making a law, ordinance, or statute to prevent such activity?  What ever happened to freedom of choice and all that rhetoric that is quickly being thrown out the window at every opportunity.  Is it not bad enough that you are tracked daily by your credit accounts and use of your social security number, and the fact that you already have minimal, and I say that laughingly, rights as a civilian when a police officer pull you over, that you want to give them more reasons to do it?  Think about the consequences of what you ask before you do.  The right to privacy  outweighs anything to be gained from a ban of cell phone use in a vehicle.  Its already bad enough that I am forced against my will, with no threat to anyone else, to wear a seatbelt, and if I don&#8217;t, greedy insurance companies can charge me higher premiums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K Curtin</title>
		<link>http://handsfreeinfo.com/massachusetts-cell-phone-laws-legislation/comment-page-1#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>K Curtin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://handsfreeinfo.com/?p=74#comment-389</guid>
		<description>My sister was in a car accident almost three years ago.  She was nineteen at the time.  She is a traumatic brain injury survivor but still is unable to walk, talk or eat.  She is confined to a wheelchair and a long-term care facility, until we are equipped to bring her home.  Her accident was caused by the distraction of her cell phone.  Her injury however was as severe as it was because she was not wearing her seatbelt.  Both of these issues need to be addressed by legislation.  (Currently Massachusetts is working on a primary seat belt law).  I WILL NOT use my cell phone if I am driving because of the devastating effect that its distraction has had on my sisters&#039; life and the lives of everyone who knows and loves her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sister was in a car accident almost three years ago.  She was nineteen at the time.  She is a traumatic brain injury survivor but still is unable to walk, talk or eat.  She is confined to a wheelchair and a long-term care facility, until we are equipped to bring her home.  Her accident was caused by the distraction of her cell phone.  Her injury however was as severe as it was because she was not wearing her seatbelt.  Both of these issues need to be addressed by legislation.  (Currently Massachusetts is working on a primary seat belt law).  I WILL NOT use my cell phone if I am driving because of the devastating effect that its distraction has had on my sisters&#8217; life and the lives of everyone who knows and loves her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
